From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20090630171937.75f64662.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090706161432.111a42ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]:54327 "EHLO vms173019pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbZGGEBs (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:01:48 -0400 In-reply-to: <20090706161432.111a42ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141, > > from include/acpi/acpi.h:56, > > from include/linux/acpi.h:38, > > from init/main.c:27: > > include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:64:22: error: asm/acpi.h: No such file or directory ... > > I have dropped the sfi tree for today. > > And the sfi tree has still not made it into linux-next as the above error > still exists. Sorry about breaking the PPC build, Stephen. I screwed up in my hack attempt to support CONFIG_SFI=y && CONFIG_ACPI=n. Let me know if you have any trouble with the latest SFI test tree. thanks, -Len