From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [SFI-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the sfi tree with the acpi tree Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20090817180610.0de34cab.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.17]:54095 "EHLO vms173017pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750961AbZH1XsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:48:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <20090817180610.0de34cab.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the sfi tree got a conflict in > drivers/acpi/tables.c between commit > 44043a4299724bb386ac7915a57a18b176e9df07 ("ACPI: check acpi_disabled in > acpi_table_parse()") from the acpi tree and commit > 55ec50ee899aa3199c126bb4b740abb9a4ab51df ("ACPI: check acpi_disabled in > acpi_table_parse() and acpi_table_parse_entries()") from the sfi tree. > > I used the sfi tree version. thanks. this should be fixed now, and both trees should again include the identical commits where they overlap. -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center