From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:02:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20091215164108.45c9d766.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091215145344.GA30710@sirena.org.uk> <20091215172717.GF4575@atomide.com> <20091216094541.e59d36fa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40813 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762131AbZLOXDD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:03:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091216094541.e59d36fa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Tony Lindgren , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Ujfalusi , Andrew Morton , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:27:17 -0800 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Mark Brown [091215 06:52]: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:41:08PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > I have applied this patch for today (please check): > > > > > > Looks good to me too, fwiw: > > > > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > > > > Good thing we have for-next to catch things like this. > > Except if the renaming patch had gone through linux-next (even for one > day) we would have found the problem *before* it was in Linus' tree ... I think maybe Tony was being ironic, exactly because of this. Linus