From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: linux-next: add utrace tree Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:45:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20100122221348.GA4263@redhat.com> <20100123112333.GA15455@elte.hu> <20100123114729.GA7828@redhat.com> <20100123194820.GM21263@thunk.org> <20100125170254.GB22862@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:41114 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754413Ab0AYRrG (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:47:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Kyle Moffett , tytso@mit.edu, Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Peter Zijlstra , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker , LKML , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , utrace-devel@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So give me a populist argument that makes sense for tons of actual users, > not some f*cking "here's a cool infrastructure that developers can do > random crazy out-of-tree crap with". Because I'm not interested in crazy > developers. In other words, give me the "killer feature". The thing I've asked for all the time. The thing that you seem to continually NOT EVEN UNDERSTAND. Linus