From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] thermal: depends on NET Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:18:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20101213163607.0b0a7c3a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101213112033.d0060e6c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110110090059.6f4d739d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-reply-to: <20110110090059.6f4d739d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , akpm , Zhang Rui , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Zimny Lech List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org > > --- linux-next-20101213.orig/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > > +++ linux-next-20101213/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > > > menuconfig THERMAL > > tristate "Generic Thermal sysfs driver" > > + depends on NET I've added this line to the offending patch. While I agree that randconfig build testing is theoretically useful, in recent memory its results do not seem particularly relevant to useful configs. Perhaps it would be a good idea to spend some time making non-useful configs impossible, and thus focus the testing where it will be of more benefit? thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center