From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:04:18 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105131203090.2831@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110513092646.GK13647@elte.hu>
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:06:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c between commit 3490f584b9ba ("clocksource: convert
> > > > x86 to generic i8253 clocksource") from the arm tree and commit b01cc1b0eae0
> > > > ("x86: Convert remaining x86 clocksources to clocksource_register_hz/khz")
> > > > from the tip tree.
> > > >
> > > > The former seems to supercede the latter, so I used the former.
> > >
> > > Russell, how the heck did this commit:
> > >
> > > commit 3490f584b9ba5a0b6f63832fbc9c5ec72506697b
> > > Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > AuthorDate: Sun May 8 18:55:19 2011 +0100
> > > Commit: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > CommitDate: Tue May 10 08:20:54 2011 +0100
> > >
> > > clocksource: convert x86 to generic i8253 clocksource
> > >
> > > which has such a clearly x86 diffstat:
> > >
> > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/i8253.h | 2 +
> > > arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c | 79 +-----------------------------------------
> > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > end up in the ARM tree without an ack from an x86 maintainer??
> >
> > The "no response" means two things: either that people are busy, [...]
>
> Had you asked us before committing it one day after it was posted, or had you
> *noticed* that those files are not in your tree and are already modified in
> linux-next, you'd have gotten a response like:
>
> --------------->
>
> Yes, the change looks good to me as well in principle. Thomas is busy this
> week, he is on a conference.
I saw it and missed it to reply, sorry.
> Guys if you want to do this outside of the x86 tree please test this series
> thoroughly on x86 as well before pushing it out anywhere permanent or pushing
> it into linux-next.
>
> Also note that there's also some pending changes in the x86 tree modifying
> arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c:
>
> b01cc1b0eae0: x86: Convert remaining x86 clocksources to clocksource_register_hz/khz
>
> If you want to do any further change to this file you need to pull in this
> change first or need to resolve the conflict in some other way.
If it makes things easier I can pull it through the tip/timers/.... as
well. Just let me know.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-13 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-13 3:14 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-13 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 8:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-13 8:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-13 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 10:04 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-05-13 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-16 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 21:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-16 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 7:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-16 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-16 9:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 10:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-16 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 11:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-16 18:47 ` John Stultz
2011-05-17 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17 18:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-20 5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-29 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1105131203090.2831@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox