From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20110825142450.c84e02d8763cfd1a93411844@canb.auug.org.au> <4E5690C3.2050706@goop.org> <4E5693DD.2010307@zytor.com> <20110826090619.7588d424798f53a6f3621eb2@canb.auug.org.au> <4E56D6E1.6030405@zytor.com> <20110826125441.709aa423cdf072ce085fb91c@canb.auug.org.au> <20110913211154.fe53ca8c1d608def77a69022@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:37960 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754346Ab1IMPHr (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:07:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110913211154.fe53ca8c1d608def77a69022@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Xen Devel , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > > > > > On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and > > > >> should be dropped. > > > > > > > > That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree. The best I could do > > > > is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into > > > > auto-latest ... I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the > > > > tip tree in the next hour). > > > > > > > > > > OK, let me bother Ingo about it. > > > > For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the > > tip tree. > > I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have > been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think. We'll take it out. Thanks, tglx