From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle : fix random hangs with intel_idle Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1331770181-800-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20120315111415.cd119171ac86967aebe85545@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120315111415.cd119171ac86967aebe85545@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Daniel Lezcano , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob.lee@linaro.org, j-pihet@ti.com, khilman@ti.com, deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:09:41 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > > The cpuidle consolidation inverts the local_irq_enable for > > the poll_idle function with CPU_RELAX. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > > Reported-by: Hugh Dickins > > So this needs to go into Rob's tree. Maybe after Hugh verifies that it > fixes his problem. Yes, Daniel got me to try it offline before he posted it. Tested-by: Hugh Dickins Personally, I'd recommend including it even before it gets into Rob's tree (where it may well be improved upon first): it does a lot to improve the usability of linux-next. Hugh