Linux-Next discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the kvm tree
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:27:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao2mNbsvmROAna2V@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfa3xML+PJK0242GiHs1warwSrf4ikN4wTTtwOUdFazhRw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 3:33 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-x86 tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   15a9a2ba0c546 ("Merge tag 'kvm-x86-selftests2-7.3' of https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux into HEAD")
> >
> > from the kvm tree and commit:
> >
> >   12c2a7f18f579 ("Merge branch 'selftests2'")
> >
> > from the kvm-x86 tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> 
> Thanks, this is just a small difference in how I fixed the conflict
> between multiple kvm-x86 pull requests. Either version is fine, and
> Sean will force-push to Linus's tree at some point anyway.

I force-pushed using kvm/next, so this should go away.  Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25 13:33 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the kvm tree Mark Brown
2026-08-25 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-08-25 14:27   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-12 14:08 Mark Brown
2026-02-12 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-02-12 15:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-17  3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-12  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-20  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-20 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ao2mNbsvmROAna2V@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox