From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600D81F192A for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737470626; cv=none; b=WaRgUUJPHHJGrvfyPx9mol7rXECBjETTBYBcExb5YloCbn6FgGvoN39JGMdAN6XTl3eYj61u2e1kxt5Ca1U8WBD9cxj1kvI1WCXHwxDLf8PoyQ4+YsbvzW6UIExUMPqaia9BgpEsGaoyFmsYzQcwB6i5DymV94GON/GefjaJGZQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737470626; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OY50ZguIBzRsOVPbQOk93Sa5ytCfUt5W8ZLPHNu6ZV0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qywLWR+Qjqkmf82zBD4FWfDnNyHtYKxQREIIvk7Homhel1sEAO7R/FYychMsXaZJ5yQSvO0IN20W9aK+CNxSkEUDlqaCuDnxsDQfz8qVEzN7C5H7PrkT+4ggY0s1UZEADkcBhyrghJLVgxBakfKeDihakTaAjS+LASVZAnD+5pE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=DVeyyImI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DVeyyImI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737470623; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2W7asi9HRh4r0ivC++MeqiIIQQRprVDeUn0WV1tUD9E=; b=DVeyyImIwDgA9esgZR12z/+0RrAJFpbAh3swJOJHRDfsy5UxlAnkWSfLPDyEKAqJDH1uQ6 ZDeCT42Rk7VBQIJYXYvygBL4HyFR37WpgDs6E5MZJbkVhBFiR4WXFlcBzodwYAP1fA6H8m Nf4iQWdaIoGNODQz1nAJ92+q2j3yROI= Received: from mail-qv1-f72.google.com (mail-qv1-f72.google.com [209.85.219.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-274-VEGzfDfGOb2kTY_TmJiYxQ-1; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:43:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: VEGzfDfGOb2kTY_TmJiYxQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: VEGzfDfGOb2kTY_TmJiYxQ Received: by mail-qv1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e1e06456c1so20235346d6.1 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737470621; x=1738075421; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2W7asi9HRh4r0ivC++MeqiIIQQRprVDeUn0WV1tUD9E=; b=KWBFX/cM3j00MC5ilmbbUz8x4Y5pdAXIYx/LoaUsge6TbK9viWuQfaIE6xhBHVi/fF d578bLV68cchtVmHzq3F73eMlysawtB0m8r5oHvpaU9UHacKTsbrAg+5jhYoXMapo/XK 5VbTPvCio3WRr0WNd+1hkmHiq8JRx/uH/+4RZyN7JEkPzwRHhacOdtUx7RM2XqCdX4Ui RRUX2sxArgOCxcvJ5q8eRGMCoCdFxQwK8J7mMpJzoqqafMZ9w4Bn6KUEDwq0bpB8T2Cx 3AcqV/49VB3Bk46D8rfWZKohLzwm9cbXUq7mo76YY4b43MrxLI3gUX2IZjplhhqsgz3I RNLQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXBgG35eBIAT7T4kKqA3zhTboI+hEbHmrjn6pOOtXg+uU+aMHd2kbrwa7Jh9rCGDtrTTa7wySY5JZvJ@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxCDmzCwHC1isDtcZdIIfAIrhimqLNRoJZkbjmZgHtZ5n0rVWum RtX5EHKd0ztNC4EmtFh/wcSdL6urZRpsIjJf+lsq5PKttuN84B1GG8JTo8e8guwkj+D7A/pRR/O HiAvHHCgYqe79ESgN7e0EkYEGMn1NC8Q/tj4p6wYIExroodMfa7BCcbrTz1A= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvGcdi+EYOown8/Cxitp+xa9TNOeefNVohFouO0pn40jLEsidmaxeeAJb3Kekd 1wMJpLgQwiWEmfjgBURILgBXlnq2s1Z9p5xgyFOsmbvc09oxRPTOkLdKM+X9qy3T1iNrR6cJYvC 0tT5hQbocygc9nROzsLlfmTZKVFhaP8X4zHUNInWbuJb7PvGdFhIGmvqi6ijRktWkOMKkT/7LmQ /p/3seDz22HwpRb2m9O86Cqzz4KYhp3fmgMOi4y+zxBMFtXuKyZtB9PUcDWjsIFxxaMTnepnpna WgSzejCKALLukA9D9bzZey/GKoE5oA1oEeunzDKbdoPJF6Tbwx54KCY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d4b:b0:6e1:728c:a5d2 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e1b2732a91mr265004526d6.6.1737470621441; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHPg2wACA4e32ElLFEXRS3jAfr5GTh3ckinlRuDB3gw6M1OzCWuweMZKgYO32Q7nSEj0LsYnA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d4b:b0:6e1:728c:a5d2 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e1b2732a91mr265004286d6.6.1737470621179; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (bras-base-aylmpq0104w-grc-14-70-52-22-87.dsl.bell.ca. [70.52.22.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6e1afce883bsm51588986d6.108.2025.01.21.06.43.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jan 2025 06:43:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:43:33 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree To: Jens Axboe , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List References: <20250110124406.17190e3a@canb.auug.org.au> <20250121183922.48b19f85@canb.auug.org.au> <054a35c4-a604-4afa-8288-13cae3f74286@redhat.com> <48d04a52-8f84-44c3-bf14-95fe9a3e9e06@kernel.dk> Content-Language: en-US, en-CA From: Luiz Capitulino In-Reply-To: <48d04a52-8f84-44c3-bf14-95fe9a3e9e06@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2025-01-21 09:40, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 1/21/25 6:57 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >> On 2025-01-21 02:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:44:06 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> >>>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >>>> >>>> io_uring/memmap.c: In function 'io_region_allocate_pages': >>>> io_uring/memmap.c:173:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'alloc_pages_bulk_array_node'; did you mean 'alloc_pages_bulk_node'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>>>    173 |         nr_allocated = alloc_pages_bulk_array_node(gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE, >>>>        |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>        |                        alloc_pages_bulk_node >>>> >>>> Caused by commit >>>> >>>>    1e21df691ffa ("io_uring/memmap: implement kernel allocated regions") >>> >>> That commit is now in Linus' tree. >>> >>>> interacting with commit >>>> >>>>    4f6a90a13f78 ("mm: alloc_pages_bulk: rename API") >>> >>> That is now commit >>> >>>    8c3cbdcf4d82 ("mm: alloc_pages_bulk: rename API") >>> >>> in the mm-stable tree. >> >> Should I resend against latest Linus tree? I thought we were going with >> your fixup... > > As long as it gets mentioned when the pull request goes out, Linus is > usually quite happy to just fix it up while merging. Cool, thanks Jens.