From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Arvid Norlander <lkml@vorpal.se>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the pm tree
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:05:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb5df3a5-016d-60bf-5a77-1261e67fe24a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220919142017.77555449@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
On 9/19/22 05:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drivers-x86 tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 574160b8548d ("ACPI: video: Add Toshiba Satellite/Portege Z830 quirk")
>
> from the pm tree and commit:
>
> c5b94f5b7819 ("ACPI: video: Change disable_backlight_sysfs_if quirks to acpi_backlight=native")
>
> from the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter change seems to incoporate the former)
Correct, the c5b94f5b7819 commit supersedes the 574160b8548d one.
Thanks you.
Regards,
Hans
> and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 4:20 linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19 7:05 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-06 0:24 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-03 2:32 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-19 5:04 Michael Ellerman
2015-06-19 19:38 ` Darren Hart
2014-01-22 5:42 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb5df3a5-016d-60bf-5a77-1261e67fe24a@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@vorpal.se \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox