From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0A44E433C; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791889551; cv=none; b=UbP07Rt5P+6ojFJzlpxcXhBQHvJ9yF1c+T1cDtDeszXEaO/PbrER5ttF8oQ4h/Tk1OW+nSmXwymC3/LZCQKLwaW44UVxcrnbQlCkwPUOa3jebrVywqoguy99BKHkP43sYa2GnHkLSUa4FA0rLPXUOBXdPc++h1a1qj4T9iocAbo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791889551; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kv1VPHKfU3feesVipQUwBeQXGbmTdkxAJIVeLOO2f0c=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IlzaT4KFmLXJxTHC9wiFyAHO1mggJU9Y45i+n57OhsbCU74391kdEFeRy3C87yGrJHEjVCctalcyOOb4oiLspSqoAM7ffPeN9/lUoLOt6MZ+mdbhRb4ZIIKZ450VXEwnf5DCUFD56aYkFFWKArLOXVI1TPX2RRVMRB3v9Vb7Ois= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Nca7MBic; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Nca7MBic" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791889549; x=1823425549; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-id; bh=kv1VPHKfU3feesVipQUwBeQXGbmTdkxAJIVeLOO2f0c=; b=Nca7MBicOaKThBndTx9G+jCGFhnwdFv0wgGnr2gcpBDjbttPSBnlTfvz tLb60nMGa4mthjgLWMxtKH8Mg0PxrptAB2OJ2+CxBRYsVD4xqNDAakx40 AQoBDHwH0q9a1ZKun8jIvHGxBElJbsPOw5X/roFGDIvaYHB0Ud7rQWQcM 1PnjDpgBHwwb5mGVQOF67P1ldWQaLAl5dAtSJqBc03QXuJIb3/R0kNSVP yi+/MKmGLtABU8vGt4b1YPLO/x3kSRfxRDp0Zv5rnyRw/wcr9oaSQ7lkM 6u7UBOKdKW7fctzwVgCMuoCURhU93tqhPlvXUwNy3mNXyU0Uw+vv5XpzO g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mbp1J4hFS/+49PPcBPBeCw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CwRV/821T/G4t/TKN9bkVw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11933"; a="641608" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,155,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="641608" Received: from fmviesa013.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.153]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2026 04:05:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6btVv9+TQgiyckqRCyWprQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NUr2j7bLQjuksck8DZmscA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,155,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="2901498" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.106]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2026 04:05:46 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 14:05:41 +0300 (EEST) To: Hans de Goede cc: Mark Brown , Mark Gross , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Missing signoff in the drivers-x86 tree In-Reply-To: <44fe29ee-9692-49f4-aaa7-7201c9cdcaba@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <4ad00775-b067-452b-9869-29d5b6712f66@sirena.org.uk> <1a363159-02b9-4644-9cc8-38e210d97d5d@sirena.org.uk> <8f4e200a-c2fd-29c6-ee4d-a91137b90c12@linux.intel.com> <44fe29ee-9692-49f4-aaa7-7201c9cdcaba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323328-1481859028-1791883712=:1237" Content-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1481859028-1791883712=:1237 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: On Tue, 13 Oct 2026, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 13-Oct-26 10:34, Ilpo J=E4rvinen wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2026, Mark Brown wrote: > >=20 > >> On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 03:37:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:53:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >>>>> Commits > >>>>> > >>>>> 4dabecbb202e8 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: add Omen Transcend 14 8C58 = support") > >>>>> 9af7fddef448d ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: suppress -ENODEV warning = in fan_curve_get_factory_default()") > >>>>> > >>>>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their authors > >>>> > >>>> This issue is still present today. > >>> > >>> And today. > >> > >> And today - should Ilpo be added to the list of contacts for this tree= ? > >=20 > > Yeah, I'm in practice the person who is handling pdx86 patches these da= ys=20 > > so it would be good. > >=20 > > ...Goes to do some massive history rewriting... >=20 > My bad, I missed you (Ilpo) were not getting these emails, sorry. I finally went and improved my patch getting script to block any=20 submissions for which git interpret-trailers shows no Sign-off-by lines. That'll make it in practice impossible for me to apply such submissions=20 anymore. It's not entirely foolproof though as the Signed-off-by could still be=20 invalid one e.g. by being different from From and I don't know easy way to= =20 extract From from a patch file (consider encodings and multiple From=20 lines properly). --=20 i. --8323328-1481859028-1791883712=:1237--