From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 7 (kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:37:00 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160907175258.1f17a8ba@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160907175258.1f17a8ba@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 09/07/16 00:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160906: > on i386: ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'get_sample': ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:258:18: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency' if (sample > tr->max_latency) ^ ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:259:6: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency' tr->max_latency = sample; ^ ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'hwlat_tracer_init': ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:583:4: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency' tr->max_latency = 0; ^ when CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE is not enabled. -- ~Randy