From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E83C433EF for ; Tue, 17 May 2022 07:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235250AbiEQHh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2022 03:37:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35452 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241958AbiEQHgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2022 03:36:09 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98DD249F02; Tue, 17 May 2022 00:35:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1652772935; x=1684308935; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d6imrCBiGBbVz2D/NUzP92KgMzg0Fvwm4TsGR5xbZNw=; b=B2wTHYVaXkep9y+Q6rCJGt65EOVhVcTRagbVxERv8N5EtT1SfE0FId01 skm2fYaXaRrLJlbvntOsLLg8BGiR6WuXgDavbSm7qdUJUTVx/821H5kUu 1n7E11AVWFMdb0sYIjonu2y4fjhnqfsvzrFL5p24fdVcmxijjWGdvrGTi ruv/SlbRoJ1KTHtzLd3UvbE3tJq2/gRpubXxkAphQGMmaSyWMiyzc4poR ZWQhqme9RB8EvkrOL3fBKRjg6nBCyKo/7zo8h2LT6o5Bc6oYLC/5AQKz2 X7wPBTLweWzU7VDl1H0s1I5UGYvQCEHN2vHdngWojue+PGjZMmDJymPc5 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10349"; a="271041373" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,232,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="271041373" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 May 2022 00:35:35 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,232,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="596991454" Received: from aghafar-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.210.37]) ([10.213.210.37]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 May 2022 00:35:33 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 08:35:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c) Content-Language: en-US To: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi References: <20220516205718.2c5a52f9@canb.auug.org.au> <1af2e702-2ea4-02ad-7682-e39cee20cc13@infradead.org> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc In-Reply-To: <1af2e702-2ea4-02ad-7682-e39cee20cc13@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 16/05/2022 22:22, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 5/16/22 03:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20220513: >> > > on i386: > > CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.o > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function ‘act_freq_mhz_show’: > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:276:20: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysfs_gt_attribute_r_max_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > u32 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_max_func(dev, attr, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function ‘boost_freq_mhz_store’: > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:327:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function ‘min_freq_mhz_show’: > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:416:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysfs_gt_attribute_r_min_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > u32 min_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_min_func(dev, attr, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > Full randconfig file is attached. There is a fix for this in 09708b6d82ef ("drm/i915/gt: Fix build error without CONFIG_PM") queued up, waiting for the next pull request, which the plan was to send out next week or so. Is that okay? Regards, Tvrtko