From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
liujinlong <liujinlong@kylinos.cn>,
liujinlong <mingliu6104@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 10:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df14f286-a00c-493d-9abd-83d42dd6b6b2@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240709175803.36f8bca6@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 09:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/kallsyms.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 7e1f4eb9a60d ("kallsyms: rework symbol lookup return codes")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 21b4564fedad ("sprint_symbol: Replace strcpy with memmove to handle
> potential overlap")
>
> from the kspp tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter, so I
> did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for pointing this out. It does look like the second
patch also just tries to address the same warning that I
fixed in my larger patch.
Kees, do you want to just drop that patch from your tree?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-09 7:58 linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-09 8:29 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-07-09 15:55 ` Kees Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-15 10:49 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-11 6:17 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-09 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-29 5:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-08 2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-06 4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-08 1:41 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-08 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-08 18:44 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df14f286-a00c-493d-9abd-83d42dd6b6b2@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujinlong@kylinos.cn \
--cc=mingliu6104@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox