From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brijesh Singh Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:41:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170825143930.494744fe@canb.auug.org.au> <2984689e-ab4e-0c22-7151-adfeeffce4ed@redhat.com> <2b021bf3-9ace-8678-0793-c0048500469c@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2b021bf3-9ace-8678-0793-c0048500469c@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini , Tom Lendacky , Stephen Rothwell , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , KVM , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yu Zhang , paolo.bonzini@gmail.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 08/25/2017 03:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/08/2017 18:53, Brijesh Singh wrote: >>> > Neither my version nor yours is correct. :) The right one has [0][i] > and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake). > > With that change, you can include my > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini > Ingo, I assuming that this patch should be sent through the tip since SME support came from tip. I will be submitting the patch very soon. -Brijesh