From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-173.mta1.migadu.com (out-173.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D799C8E6 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 14:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775314273; cv=none; b=PXtYwWXgWtRCEA4PuYkiH5CjuhvmaQuxOtV5w+QslPN7y9YpXSbxi62T71tOTTNj44eoNxgwmm2bEk5k+rg2d3ySve4fnpasq72SWoU0inBrTl4JxvrGvr5GyTMZQTB2pGHU+j6/yyHEtxkGjP7d2pYqXURucAVx/mkK44aCzb8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775314273; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eXXGY65yQbjqTCJAdffT5TRfg0jKNW9bIdNInhzDrRM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=g3KrnvgtKnIGSyCJqqdhSN/j2Tk27Cam3LAK5PZv/oKARjxlNMeHulWeLjQBg9vM5rCJbXOyfOJkSyk7/6UpkYMENs3Lhd6ix1d8i+ef85lpCkzSvbNQqCHwXxAooJPBW3nzsmL8PrLXOBZIzX0JIMBg2u+OB2x4VkrO2ovYWuw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=W+J7XWyS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="W+J7XWyS" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1775314270; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QYHRYlnSBx4/kcPH5WdquDIpIV1olp37fUOVSMfoMPc=; b=W+J7XWySSqmygWJf3mqeQ0lO9keWCTazufEKjj1smyHIzkUNPVqMqx19P1YqE7EtaGR2U3 4B5RGYNQm0RYp7DwqZlDFQ+i9w55qKyzkxcQjmTp/CUGTshfbYVsSyTUdtnDdO9hc3IHa0 gEHx2amdjNeT4gmNXutVJFddzAGAq8U= Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 15:50:59 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Please add rust-i2c-next and rust-i2c-fixes to linux-next To: Mark Brown , Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org References: <02908210-0ed5-42a7-b725-8bf70f936828@linux.dev> <20260329105919.73dea963@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Igor Korotin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hello Mark On 3/30/2026 2:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 12:27:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 10:59:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >>>> Please add the following tree to linux-next: >>>> Tree: https://github.com/ikrtn/rust-for-linux >>>> - Branch: rust-i2c-next >>>> - Branch: rust-i2c-fixes >> >>> Mark Brown (cc'd) now maintains the linux-next tree. >> >> All being well these should be included from today. > > BTW I note that both trees have the same content and that looks like > -next material, I would expect the -fixes branch to be based on Linus' > tree and only contain bug fixes. Both branches currently have identical content because they are newly created. If the -fixes branch is expected to be based on Linus’s tree and contain only bug fixes, I can rebase it accordingly. Please confirm the preferred base branch. Thanks Igor