Re: [bug report] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1386 at block/blk-mq-sched.c:432 blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x54/0x178

Ming Lei
2021-11-03T14:58:02Z

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:59:02PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 7:59 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/2/21 9:54 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Nov 2, 2021, at 9:52 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ﻿On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:21:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>>> On 11/2/21 8:21 PM, Yi Zhang wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Can either one of you try with this patch? Won't fix anything, but it'll
> > >>>>>> hopefully shine a bit of light on the issue.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>> Hi Jens
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Here is the full log:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks! I think I see what it could be - can you try this one as well,
> > >>> would like to confirm that the condition I think is triggering is what
> > >>> is triggering.
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > >>> index 07eb1412760b..81dede885231 100644
> > >>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > >>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > >>> @@ -2515,6 +2515,8 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> > >>> if (plug && plug->cached_rq) {
> > >>> rq = rq_list_pop(&plug->cached_rq);
> > >>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
> > >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(q->elevator && !(rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
> > >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!q->elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
> > >>> } else {
> > >>> struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
> > >>> .q = q,
> > >>> @@ -2535,6 +2537,8 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> > >>> bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> > >>> goto queue_exit;
> > >>> }
> > >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(q->elevator && !(rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
> > >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!q->elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV));
> > >>
> > >> Hello Jens,
> > >>
> > >> I guess the issue could be the following code run without grabbing
> > >> ->q_usage_counter from blk_mq_alloc_request() and blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx().
> > >>
> > >> .rq_flags = q->elevator ? RQF_ELV : 0,
> > >>
> > >> then elevator is switched to real one from none, and check on q->elevator
> > >> becomes not consistent.
> > >
> > > Indeed, that’s where I was going with this. I have a patch, testing it
> > > locally but it’s getting late. Will send it out tomorrow. The nice
> > > benefit is that it allows dropping the weird ref get on plug flush,
> > > and batches getting the refs as well.
> >
> > Yi/Steffen, can you try pulling this into your test kernel:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block for-next
> >
> > and see if it fixes the issue for you. Thanks!
>
> It still can be reproduced with the latest linux-block/for-next, here is the log
>
> fab2914e46eb (HEAD, new/for-next) Merge branch 'for-5.16/drivers' into for-next

Hi Yi,

Please try the following change:

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index e1e64964a31b..eb634a9c61ff 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -494,7 +494,6 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op,
.q = q,
.flags = flags,
.cmd_flags = op,
- .rq_flags = q->elevator ? RQF_ELV : 0,
.nr_tags = 1,
};
struct request *rq;
@@ -504,6 +503,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op,
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);

+ data.rq_flags = q->elevator ? RQF_ELV : 0,
rq = __blk_mq_alloc_requests(&data);
if (!rq)
goto out_queue_exit;
@@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
.q = q,
.flags = flags,
.cmd_flags = op,
- .rq_flags = q->elevator ? RQF_ELV : 0,
.nr_tags = 1,
};
u64 alloc_time_ns = 0;
@@ -551,6 +550,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
ret = blk_queue_enter(q, flags);
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ data.rq_flags = q->elevator ? RQF_ELV : 0,

/*
* Check if the hardware context is actually mapped to anything.

Thanks,
Ming