From: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the drbd tree
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:33:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea26bf6b-ad04-4d7e-9f6a-bdbbc8acf594@linbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be3cce14-c069-4325-b093-12dd26892119@sirena.org.uk>
Am 25.03.26 um 17:57 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
>> Am 25.03.26 um 17:30 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>
>>> I won't submit the changes in for-7.1/drbd, but just expect you to send
>>> a new series against for-7.2/block when that is a thing. The 7.2 one
>>> should be closer to going upstream, and so forth. Within a few revisions
>>> of the mainline kernel, we'll get to the point where for-7.x/drbd can be
>>> included in the merge window pull request as well, and we're done at
>>> that point and future drbd changes will just get submitted against
>>> for-7.x/block like any other block driver.
>
>> Sounds like a plan. I'll send the rebased series this week.
>> We already have a few "get it closer to going upstream" patches in the
>> pipeline targeted for the 7.1 and 7.2 merge windows, but none of them
>> are truly ready yet. So this approach would fit very well.
>
>> Exactly, once we are done with all this we will adopt a "normal"
>> upstream-first dev approach again. We've already discussed changes to
>> our internal workflow to make sure we never digress this far from
>> upstream again -- I think that's in all our interests :)
>
> So I should just drop the drbd tree entirely from tomorrow?
I guess that would actually be the easiest path then, yes.
Sorry for the churn on your side.
--
Christoph Böhmwalder
LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
DRBD HA — Disaster Recovery — Software defined Storage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 15:41 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the drbd tree Mark Brown
2026-03-25 15:56 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-25 16:07 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-25 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 16:47 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-25 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-25 17:33 ` Christoph Böhmwalder [this message]
2026-03-25 17:55 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-25 18:35 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 16:25 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea26bf6b-ad04-4d7e-9f6a-bdbbc8acf594@linbit.com \
--to=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox