From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:54:26 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20080703133905.7b6f058f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080703054739.GA643@secretlab.ca> <9e4733910807030522h1aa0bl1801ecc5fc877c25@mail.gmail.com> <20080703152453.GB2284@secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.244]:46873 "EHLO ag-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbYGDFy3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:54:29 -0400 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so7079192agc.10 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:54:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080703152453.GB2284@secretlab.ca> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jon Smirl Cc: Stephen Rothwell , galak@kernel.crashing.org, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jean Delvare , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:22:18AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> Testing was good when the patch was initially posted in January. In >> the last six months the initial patch set has been sliced and diced >> into a bunch of different pieces but the contents of this patch are >> essentially unchanged. >> >> I don't care which tree it uses to get to mainline, I'd just like to >> see it get merged. > > Me too, but it is used by some of the mpc8xxx platforms too, so I'd like > to see an ack from one of those users also. Okay, I've tested it on my board. All looks good to me. I'd prefer to hear back from one of the Freescale folks, but on a second reading I think it is pretty safe. I'll make sure any merge conflicts are resolved. Jean, is it okay with you to drop it from your tree and merge it through mine? Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.