From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneeshkumar.opensource@gmail.com>,
Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: sachinp <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
npiggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
manvanth <manvanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG][linux-next][ppc] kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: __schedule+0x978/0xa80
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:06:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc53fa1c-e7b1-dc84-1b5d-d66870aad4e3@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da8634b4-77ae-90e3-b6b4-fa1284ed8d85@linux.ibm.com>
Le 12/10/2018 à 11:02, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> On 10/12/18 1:38 PM, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 12/10/2018 à 09:48, Abdul Haleem a écrit :
>>> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 13:15 +0530, Abdul Haleem wrote:
>>>> Greeting's
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next fails to boot on powerpc bare-metal with this error
>>>>
>>>> POWER8 performance monitor hardware support registered
>>>> rcu: Hierarchical SRCU implementation.
>>>> smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is
>>>> corrupted in: __schedule+0x978/0xa80
>>>> CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
>>>> 4.19.0-rc7-next-20181010-autotest-autotest #1
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> [c000001fed5b3bf0] [c000000000a0ef3c] dump_stack+0xb0/0xf4 (unreliable)
>>>> [c000001fed5b3c30] [c0000000000f9d68] panic+0x140/0x308
>>>> [c000001fed5b3cc0] [c0000000000f9844] __stack_chk_fail+0x24/0x30
>>>> [c000001fed5b3d20] [c000000000a2c3a8] __schedule+0x978/0xa80
>>>> [c000001fed5b3e00] [c000000000a2c9b4] schedule_idle+0x34/0x60
>>>> [c000001fed5b3e30] [c00000000013d344] do_idle+0x224/0x3d0
>>>> [c000001fed5b3ec0] [c00000000013d6e0] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x50
>>>> [c000001fed5b3ef0] [c000000000047f34] start_secondary+0x4d4/0x520
>>>> [c000001fed5b3f90] [c00000000000b370] start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
>>>> Rebooting in 10 seconds..
>>>>
>>>> Machine: Power 8 bare-metal
>>>> kernel version: 4.19.0-rc7-next-20181010
>>>> gcc version: 4.8.5 20150623
>>>> config attach
>>>
>>> Attaching the kernel config file
>>>
>>
>> # Linux/powerpc 4.11.0-rc4 Kernel Configuration
>>
>> This is not the correct config file. Can you send the .config ?
>>
>> Christophe
>
> modified kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state)
> * make this generic (ARM and SH have never invoked the canary
> * init for the non boot CPUs!). Will be fixed in 3.11
> */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> /*
> * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up
> * for us. The boot CPU already has it initialized but no harm
> @@ -361,7 +360,6 @@ void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state)
> * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger).
> */
> boot_init_stack_canary();
> -#endif
> arch_cpu_idle_prepare();
> cpuhp_online_idle(state);
> while (1)
>
>
> This fixes it for me. But we may have to look at the other arch details
> mentioned there.
I think calling again boot_init_stack_canary() will be an issue for all
arches using global canary.
As far as I can see, PPC and X86 are the only arches using non global.
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 7:45 [BUG][linux-next][ppc] kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: __schedule+0x978/0xa80 Abdul Haleem
2018-10-12 7:48 ` Abdul Haleem
2018-10-12 8:08 ` Christophe LEROY
2018-10-12 9:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-10-12 9:20 ` Christophe LEROY
2018-10-12 12:06 ` Christophe LEROY [this message]
2018-10-12 10:31 ` Abdul Haleem
2018-10-12 10:36 ` Christophe LEROY
2018-10-12 13:23 ` Abdul Haleem
2018-10-13 9:47 ` Christophe LEROY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc53fa1c-e7b1-dc84-1b5d-d66870aad4e3@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneeshkumar.opensource@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=manvanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox