From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [-next July 9 - s390 ] Badness at fs/sysfs/symlink.c:82 during qeth initalization Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:39:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100709150117.51612026.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C36EF9C.7010804@in.ibm.com> <4C36F974.4030608@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:59578 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752792Ab0GIKjd (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 06:39:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C36F974.4030608@in.ibm.com> (Sachin Sant's message of "Fri\, 09 Jul 2010 15\:57\:00 +0530") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sachin Sant Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Heiko Carstens Sachin Sant writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> With today's next(20100709) qeth interface fails to initialize >>> with following Badness message: >>> sysfs: symlink across ns_types 0.0.6000/net:eth0 -> net/eth0 >>> >> >> Is this with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set? >> >> I think I may have made my warning check a little extra strict. >> > Yes. > > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y Ugh. It looks like the warning is correct and I have a regression in 2.6.35 that was overlooked because I did not closely test CONIFG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED. I will see if I can cook up a proper patch shortly. Eric