From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17ic6qauk.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48695449.5010602@zytor.com> (H. Peter Anvin's message of "Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:46:49 -0700")
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
> Here is a patch to replace the hard-coded limit with dynamic allocation. I have
> only build-tested it, but it seems to work.
>
> Please try it out; barring any screams to the contrary I'll add it to -tip.
Looks reasonable to me. When generalizing from a test program to something
that can be used every day I think I just overlooked the fact that I had not
dynamically allocated the section count.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-01 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-30 14:16 linux-next: Tree for June 30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-30 16:02 ` [BUILD-FAILURE] " Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 16:43 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 18:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-30 19:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 19:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-30 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 20:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-30 20:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-01 2:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-07-01 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 8:15 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-07-01 9:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 17:59 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-30 18:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 18:25 ` [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30 - powerpc - build failure at arch_add_memory() Kamalesh Babulal
2008-07-01 1:34 ` Tony Breeds
2008-07-01 8:04 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 18:43 ` linux-next: Tree for June 30 (USB: cdc-acm) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-30 19:01 ` Greg KH
2008-06-30 19:32 ` Alan Stern
2008-07-01 12:22 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-07-01 17:10 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17ic6qauk.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).