From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net tree Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 00:43:55 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100521162134.6b6326bd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100520.235008.97331614.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:41529 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753517Ab0EUHoE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 03:44:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100520.235008.97331614.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu\, 20 May 2010 23\:50\:08 -0700 \(PDT\)") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, greg@kroah.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 23:46:22 -0700 > >> It looks right, except perhaps the RPS code looks like it will cause a >> build failure with sysfs disabled, but that has nothing to do with your >> changes. > > CONFIG_RPS depends upon CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_SYSFS, so no that build > failure is not possible. That's the bit I'm missing. My apologies if I caused any unnecessary worry. Eric