From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: linux-next: sysctl tree build failure Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:10:38 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20091112184805.1c0720cb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091112191451.d21250f2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091112214706.7c7b3168.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:58882 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018AbZKLMKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:10:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091112214706.7c7b3168.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Thu\, 12 Nov 2009 21\:47\:06 +1100") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Eric, > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:11:34 -0800 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: >> >> Any clue how all_noconfig happened to have CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL set? > > CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL defaults to y and only depends on > CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL which also defaults to y and depends on CONFIG_PROC_FS > which also defaults to y. All three are only selectable if > CONFIG_EMBEDDED is y (which it obviously isn't). Ah so. An interesting twist of fate. Thank you for satisfying my curiosity. Eric