From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: linux-next: drbd tree build failure Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:01:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090729152938.791a81c3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090818153250.5ce293b5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:56071 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750945AbZHRGCN (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:02:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090818153250.5ce293b5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:32:50 +1000") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Philipp Reisner , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe >>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell writes: >> We've decided to keep blk_queue_stack_limits as a wrapper to ease the >> transition. I sent Jens a patch earlier today that does this. Stephen> I am still getting this error (3 weeks later) ... :-( Jens applied it to for-linus and it's been upstream for a while. But it looks like the block for-next tree has stale bits... Jens? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering