From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: linux-next: md tree build failure Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:17:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090525153346.758483fc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090525061552.GH11363@kernel.dk> <20090601144218.26810ec8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <39efa6d3788eec04b0bc86b02d988c8f.squirrel@neil.brown.name> <18983.18515.445191.401600@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:25754 "EHLO acsinet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750724AbZFDER1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:17:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <18983.18515.445191.401600@notabene.brown> (Neil Brown's message of "Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:06:43 +1000") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Neil Brown Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Jens Axboe , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer >>>>> "Neil" == Neil Brown writes: Neil> OK, I've just rebased my for-next tree against Jens' for-next, and Neil> fixed the compile error with this incremental patch Excellent - thanks for doing this! Neil> - if (mddev->chunk_size % mddev->queue->hardsect_size) { Neil> + if (mddev->chunk_size % queue_logical_block_size(mddev->queue)) Neil> I assume that is the preferred usage? Yup. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering