From: "Steve Wise" <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
To: "'Sagi Grimberg'" <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
"'Chuck Lever'" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 7/8] xprtrdma: Split the completion queue
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:46:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005201cf598b$016ab3d0$04401b70$@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534E9F40.8000905@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:18 AM
> To: Steve Wise; 'Chuck Lever'; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xprtrdma: Split the completion queue
>
> On 4/16/2014 5:43 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> >>>> Hmm, But if either FASTREG or LINV failed the QP will go to error state
> >>>> and you *will* get the error wc (with a rain of FLUSH errors).
> >>>> AFAICT it is safe to assume that it succeeded as long as you don't get
> >>>> error completions.
> >>> But if an unsignaled FASTREG is posted and silently succeeds, then the next signaled work
> >> request fails, I believe the FASTREG will be completed with FLUSH status, yet the operation
> >> actually completed in the hw.
> >>
> >> Actually if (any) WR successfully completed and SW got it as FLUSH error
> >> it seems like a bug to me.
> >> Once the HW processed the WQ entry it should update the consumer index
> >> accordingly thus should not happen.
> > Aren't you assuming a specific hardware design/implementation? For cxgb4, the fact that a
> work request was consumed by the HW from the host send queue in no way indicates it is
> complete. Also, the RDMA specs specifically state that the rnic/hca implementation can only
> assume an unsignaled work request completes successfully (and make its slot in the SQ
> available for the ULP) when a subsequent signaled work request completes successfully. So if
> the next signaled work request fails, I believe the completion status of prior unsignaled work
> requests is indeterminate.
>
> Well actually I wasn't, I just assumed that FLUSH errors will come for
> all WQ entries in the range {CI, PI}.
> I get it, if a suppressed WQe was consumed and QP went to error state
> before a completion was placed, HW may flush it as well.
> I agree this may happen. Thanks!
>
Thank you! :) In fact, chelsio HW doesn't do ANY flushing. It is all done in software at the time the QP exits RTS...
Stevo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 22:22 [PATCH 0/8] NFS/RDMA patches for review Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] xprtrdma: RPC/RDMA must invoke xprt_wake_pending_tasks() in process context Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] xprtrdma: Remove BOUNCEBUFFERS memory registration mode Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] xprtrdma: Disable ALLPHYSICAL mode by default Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] xprtrdma: Remove support for MEMWINDOWS registration mode Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] xprtrdma: Simplify rpcrdma_deregister_external() synopsis Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] xprtrdma: Make rpcrdma_ep_destroy() return void Chuck Lever
2014-04-14 22:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] xprtrdma: Split the completion queue Chuck Lever
2014-04-16 12:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-16 13:30 ` Steve Wise
2014-04-16 14:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-16 14:25 ` Steve Wise
2014-04-16 14:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-16 14:43 ` Steve Wise
2014-04-16 15:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-16 15:46 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2014-04-16 15:08 ` Chuck Lever
2014-04-16 15:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-16 18:21 ` Chuck Lever
2014-04-17 7:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-17 13:55 ` Chuck Lever
2014-04-17 14:34 ` Steve Wise
2014-04-17 19:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-19 16:31 ` Chuck Lever
2014-04-20 12:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-17 19:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-04-14 22:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] xprtrdma: Reduce the number of hardway buffer allocations Chuck Lever
2014-04-15 20:15 ` [PATCH 0/8] NFS/RDMA patches for review Steve Wise
2014-04-15 20:20 ` Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005201cf598b$016ab3d0$04401b70$@opengridcomputing.com' \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).