From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>, trondmy@kernel.org, anna@kernel.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] SUNRPC: Check if we need to recalculate slack estimates
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:44:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02f6a095-5f64-4e06-b799-6213f207fa4c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120121252.3724988-1-smayhew@redhat.com>
On 11/20/25 7:12 AM, Scott Mayhew wrote:
> If the incoming GSS verifier is larger than what we previously recorded
> on the gss_auth, that would indicate the GSS cred/context used for that
> RPC is using a different enctype than the one used by the machine
> cred/context, and we should recalculate the slack variables accordingly.
>
> Link: https://bugs.debian.org/1120598
Since there is a bug link, a Fixes: tag is recommended.
> Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
> index 5c095cb8cb20..bff5f10581a2 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
> @@ -1721,6 +1721,18 @@ gss_validate(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
> if (maj_stat)
> goto bad_mic;
>
> + /*
> + * Normally we only recalculate the slack variables once after
> + * creating a new gss_auth, but we should also do it if the incoming
> + * verifier has a larger size than what was previously recorded.
> + * When the incoming verifier is larger than expected, the
> + * GSS context is using a different enctype than the one used
> + * initially by the machine credential. Force a slack size update
> + * to maintain good payload alignment.
> + */
> + if (cred->cr_auth->au_verfsize < (XDR_QUADLEN(len) + 2))
> + __set_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_UPDATE_SLACK, &cred->cr_auth->au_flags);
set_bit() rather than __set_bit is a better choice for a lockless update
where multiple concurrent threads can have access to the flags field.
> +
> /* We leave it to unwrap to calculate au_rslack. For now we just
> * calculate the length of the verifier: */
> if (test_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_UPDATE_SLACK, &cred->cr_auth->au_flags))
Thanks for pursuing this one, Scott.
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 12:12 [PATCH v2] SUNRPC: Check if we need to recalculate slack estimates Scott Mayhew
2025-11-20 13:44 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-11-20 14:30 ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-20 20:22 ` Scott Mayhew
2025-12-03 19:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-12-04 13:53 ` Scott Mayhew
2025-12-04 14:00 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02f6a095-5f64-4e06-b799-6213f207fa4c@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox