public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: trondmy@gmail.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Readdir enhancements
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 07:49:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0A45C334-A375-47DC-BA04-F25341F263FA@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104161638.300324-1-trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

On 4 Nov 2020, at 11:16, trondmy@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
>
> The following patch series performs a number of cleanups on the readdir
> code.
> It also adds support for 1MB readdir RPC calls on-the-wire, and modifies
> the caching code to ensure that we cache the entire contents of that
> 1MB call (instead of discarding the data that doesn't fit into a single
> page).
>
> v2: Fix the handling of the NFSv3/v4 directory verifier
> v3: Optimise searching when the readdir cookies are seen to be ordered

Hi Trond, thanks for these.

I did a bit of testing with these on 4-core/4G client listing 1.5M files
with READDIR.  I compared v5.10-rc2 without/with this set.

+------+     v5.10.rc-2      +--+ this v3 patch set  +
| run  |  time   | rpc calls |  |  time  | rpc calls |

nfsv3 with dtsize 262144:
+------+---------+-----------+--+--------+-----------+
| 1    | 81.583  | 14710     |  | 53.568 | 215       |
| 2    | 81.147  | 14710     |  | 50.781 | 215       |
| 3    | 81.61   | 14710     |  | 50.514 | 215       |
| 4    | 82.405  | 14710     |  | 50.746 | 215       |
| 5    | 82.066  | 14710     |  | 50.397 | 215       |
| 6    | 82.395  | 14710     |  | 50.892 | 215       |
| 7    | 81.657  | 14710     |  | 50.882 | 215       |
| 8    | 81.555  | 14710     |  | 50.981 | 215       |
| 9    | 81.421  | 14710     |  | 50.558 | 215       |
| 10   | 81.472  | 14710     |  | 50.588 | 215       |

nfsv3 with dtsize 1048576:
+------+---------+-----------+--+--------+-----------+
| 1    | 81.563  | 14710     |  | 52.692 | 61        |
| 2    | 82.123  | 14710     |  | 49.934 | 61        |
| 3    | 81.714  | 14710     |  | 50.158 | 61        |
| 4    | 81.707  | 14710     |  | 50.083 | 61        |
| 5    | 81.44   | 14710     |  | 50.045 | 61        |
| 6    | 81.685  | 14710     |  | 50.021 | 61        |
| 7    | 81.17   | 14710     |  | 50.131 | 61        |
| 8    | 81.366  | 14710     |  | 49.928 | 61        |
| 9    | 81.067  | 14710     |  | 50.081 | 61        |
| 10   | 81.524  | 14710     |  | 50.442 | 61        |

nfsv4 with dtsize 32768:
+------+---------+-----------+--+--------+-----------+
| 1    | 99.534  | 14712     |  | 79.461 | 331       |
| 2    | 98.998  | 14712     |  | 79.338 | 331       |
| 3    | 99.462  | 14712     |  | 81.101 | 331       |
| 4    | 99.891  | 14712     |  | 78.888 | 331       |
| 5    | 99.516  | 14712     |  | 81.147 | 331       |
| 6    | 98.649  | 14712     |  | 83.084 | 331       |
| 7    | 101.159 | 14712     |  | 80.461 | 331       |
| 8    | 100.402 | 14712     |  | 79.003 | 331       |
| 9    | 98.548  | 14712     |  | 80.619 | 331       |
| 10   | 97.456  | 14712     |  | 81.317 | 331       |

nfsv4 with dtsize 1048576:
+------+---------+-----------+--+--------+-----------+
| 1    | 100.357 | 14712     |  | 78.976 | 91        |
| 2    | 99.61   | 14712     |  | 79.328 | 91        |
| 3    | 101.095 | 14712     |  | 80.649 | 91        |
| 4    | 107.904 | 14712     |  | 78.285 | 91        |
| 5    | 103.665 | 14712     |  | 79.258 | 91        |
| 6    | 98.877  | 14712     |  | 78.817 | 91        |
| 7    | 99.567  | 14712     |  | 81.11  | 91        |
| 8    | 99.096  | 14712     |  | 80.296 | 91        |
| 9    | 100.124 | 14712     |  | 78.865 | 91        |
| 10   | 100.603 | 14712     |  | 79.143 | 91        |

These look great.  Feel free to add either/both of my:
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>

Ben


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-07 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 16:16 [PATCH v3 00/17] Readdir enhancements trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] NFS: Ensure contents of struct nfs_open_dir_context are consistent trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16   ` [PATCH v3 02/17] NFS: Clean up readdir struct nfs_cache_array trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16     ` [PATCH v3 03/17] NFS: Clean up nfs_readdir_page_filler() trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16       ` [PATCH v3 04/17] NFS: Clean up directory array handling trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16         ` [PATCH v3 05/17] NFS: Don't discard readdir results trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16           ` [PATCH v3 06/17] NFS: Remove unnecessary kmap in nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array() trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16             ` [PATCH v3 07/17] NFS: Replace kmap() with kmap_atomic() in nfs_readdir_search_array() trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16               ` [PATCH v3 08/17] NFS: Simplify struct nfs_cache_array_entry trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] NFS: Support larger readdir buffers trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                   ` [PATCH v3 10/17] NFS: More readdir cleanups trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                     ` [PATCH v3 11/17] NFS: nfs_do_filldir() does not return a value trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                       ` [PATCH v3 12/17] NFS: Reduce readdir stack usage trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                         ` [PATCH v3 13/17] NFS: Cleanup to remove nfs_readdir_descriptor_t typedef trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                           ` [PATCH v3 14/17] NFS: Allow the NFS generic code to pass in a verifier to readdir trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                             ` [PATCH v3 15/17] NFS: Handle NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME and NFSERR_BADCOOKIE from readdir calls trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                               ` [PATCH v3 16/17] NFS: Improve handling of directory verifiers trondmy
2020-11-04 16:16                                 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] NFS: Optimisations for monotonically increasing readdir cookies trondmy
2020-11-04 21:01                                 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] NFS: Improve handling of directory verifiers David Wysochanski
2020-11-04 21:31                                   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-04 21:40                                     ` David Wysochanski
2020-11-06 13:30           ` [PATCH v3 05/17] NFS: Don't discard readdir results David Wysochanski
2020-11-06 15:05             ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-06 18:00               ` David Wysochanski
2020-11-07 12:49 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2020-11-07 14:23   ` [PATCH v3 00/17] Readdir enhancements Trond Myklebust
2020-11-08 11:05     ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-08 18:15   ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0A45C334-A375-47DC-BA04-F25341F263FA@redhat.com \
    --to=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox