public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] SUNRPC: make rqst_should_sleep() idempotent()
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:33:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c4b0d2cec4d49a4ff845771b88bf26771b65ff5.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731064839.7729-2-neilb@suse.de>

On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 16:48 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Based on its name you would think that rqst_should_sleep() would be
> read-only, not changing anything.  But it fact it will clear
> SP_TASK_PENDING if that was set.  This is surprising, and it blurs the
> line between "check for work to do" and "dequeue work to do".
> 
> So change the "test_and_clear" to simple "test" and clear the bit once
> the thread has decided to wake up and return to the caller.
> 
> With this, it makes sense to *always* set SP_TASK_PENDING when asked,
> rather than only to set it if no thread could be woken up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index cd92cb54132d..380fb3caea4c 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -581,8 +581,8 @@ void svc_wake_up(struct svc_serv *serv)
>  {
>  	struct svc_pool *pool = &serv->sv_pools[0];
>  
> -	if (!svc_pool_wake_idle_thread(serv, pool))
> -		set_bit(SP_TASK_PENDING, &pool->sp_flags);
> +	set_bit(SP_TASK_PENDING, &pool->sp_flags);
> +	svc_pool_wake_idle_thread(serv, pool);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_wake_up);
>  
> @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ rqst_should_sleep(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  	struct svc_pool		*pool = rqstp->rq_pool;
>  
>  	/* did someone call svc_wake_up? */
> -	if (test_and_clear_bit(SP_TASK_PENDING, &pool->sp_flags))
> +	if (test_bit(SP_TASK_PENDING, &pool->sp_flags))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* was a socket queued? */
> @@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_get_next_xprt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  
>  	set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags);
>  	smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +	clear_bit(SP_TASK_PENDING, &pool->sp_flags);

Took me a few mins to decide that splitting up the test_and_clear_bit
didn't open a ToC/ToU race. I think we're saved by the fact that only
nfsd thread itself clears the bit, so we're guaranteed not to race with
another clear (whew).
 
>  	rqstp->rq_xprt = svc_xprt_dequeue(pool);
>  	if (rqstp->rq_xprt) {
>  		trace_svc_pool_awoken(rqstp);
> @@ -761,6 +762,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_get_next_xprt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  	percpu_counter_inc(&pool->sp_threads_no_work);
>  	return NULL;
>  out_found:
> +	clear_bit(SP_TASK_PENDING, &pool->sp_flags);
>  	/* Normally we will wait up to 5 seconds for any required
>  	 * cache information to be provided.
>  	 */

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-31 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31  6:48 [PATCH 00/12] SUNRPC: various thread management improvements NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 01/12] SUNRPC: make rqst_should_sleep() idempotent() NeilBrown
2023-07-31 14:21   ` Chuck Lever
2023-07-31 22:05     ` NeilBrown
2023-07-31 22:31       ` Chuck Lever III
2023-07-31 14:33   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 02/12] FIXUP: SUNRPC: Deduplicate thread wake-up code NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 03/12] FIXUP: SUNRPC: call svc_process() from svc_recv() NeilBrown
2023-07-31 14:22   ` Chuck Lever
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfsd: Simplify code around svc_exit_thread() call in nfsd() NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfsd: separate nfsd_last_thread() from nfsd_put() NeilBrown
2023-07-31 14:23   ` Chuck Lever
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 06/12] SUNRPC: rename and refactor svc_get_next_xprt() NeilBrown
2023-07-31 23:16   ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-01 22:46     ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-02  5:00     ` NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 07/12] SUNRPC: move all of xprt handling into svc_xprt_handle() NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 08/12] SUNRPC: move task-dequeueing code into svc_recv() NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 09/12] SUNRPC: integrate back-channel processing with svc_recv() NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 10/12] SUNRPC: change how svc threads are asked to exit NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 11/12] SUNRPC: add list of idle threads NeilBrown
2023-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 12/12] SUNRPC: discard SP_CONGESTED NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c4b0d2cec4d49a4ff845771b88bf26771b65ff5.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox