From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:17:18 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1004506484.223854.1750929438192.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2a8b1e647e9d5f74e0ab5dd0924495625a02d3f.camel@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3601 bytes --]
I posted a different patch with the suggested approach.
Tigran.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>
> To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>, "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: "Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2025 21:39:15
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
> On Wed, 2025-06-25 at 21:19 +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Do you have any opinion on this one? Would you like me to address it
>> differently?
>>
>
> I don't think we should mark the device as being unavailable just
> because someone signalled the RPC task.
>
> It would be better to have nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() return any fatal
> errors that it encounters using ERR_PTR(), so that the callers can
> handle them. Then maybe return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN) for the case where we
> currently return NULL so that those callers don't have to use the hated
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() test.
>
>> Tigran.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> > To: "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
>> > Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>, "Anna Schumaker"
>> > <anna@kernel.org>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan"
>> > <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> > Sent: Monday, 9 June, 2025 23:43:03
>> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on
>> > fatal connection error
>>
>> > Fixes: 260f32adb88 ("pNFS/flexfiles: Check the result of
>> > nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect")
>> >
>> > When an applications get killed (SIGTERM/SIGINT) while pNFS client
>> > performs a
>> > connection
>> > to DS, client ends in an infinite loop of connect-disconnect. This
>> > source of the issue, it that
>> > flexfilelayoutdev#nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds gets an
>> > error
>> > on nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect with status ERESTARTSYS, which is set by
>> > rpc_signal_task, but
>> > the error is treated as transient, thus retried.
>> >
>> > The issue is reproducible with script as (there should be ~1000
>> > files in
>> > a directory, client should must not have any connections to DSes):
>> >
>> > ```
>> > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>> >
>> > for i in *
>> > do
>> > head -1 $i &
>> > PP=$!
>> > sleep 10e-03
>> > kill -TERM $PP
>> > done
>> > ```
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> > ---
>> > fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 ++++
>> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > index 4a304cf17c4b..0008a8180c9b 100644
>> > --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > @@ -410,6 +410,10 @@ nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(struct
>> > pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>> > mirror->mirror_ds->ds_versions[0].wsize =
>> > max_payload;
>> > goto out;
>> > }
>> > + /* There is a fatal error to connect to DS. Mark it
>> > unavailable to avoid
>> > infinite retry loop. */
>> > + if (nfs_error_is_fatal(status))
>> > + nfs4_mark_deviceid_unavailable(&mirror->mirror_ds-
>> > >id_node);
>> > +
>> > noconnect:
>> > ff_layout_track_ds_error(FF_LAYOUT_FROM_HDR(lseg-
>> > >pls_layout),
>> > mirror, lseg->pls_range.offset,
>> > --
>> > 2.49.0
>
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> trondmy@kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2826 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 21:43 [PATCH 0/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error Tigran Mkrtchyan
2025-06-09 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Tigran Mkrtchyan
2025-06-25 19:19 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2025-06-25 19:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-06-26 9:17 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1004506484.223854.1750929438192.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de \
--to=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox