From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-cluster@redhat.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NFS] [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 02:54:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150268091.28264.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17550.11870.186706.36949@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Hi,
KABI (kernel application binary interface) commitment is a big thing
from our end - so I would like to focus more on the interface agreement
before jumping into coding and implementation details.
> One is the multiple-lockd-threads idea.
Assume we still have this on the table.... Could I expect the admin
interface goes thru rpc.lockd command (man page and nfs-util code
changes) ? The modified command will take similar options as rpc.statd;
more specifically, the -n, -o, and -p (see "man rpc.statd"). To pass the
individual IP (socket address) to kernel, we'll need nfsctl with struct
nfsctl_svc modified.
For the kernel piece, since we're there anyway, could we have the
individual lockd IP interface passed to SM (statd) (in SM_MON call) ?
This would allow statd to structure its SM files based on each lockd IP
address, an important part of lock recovery.
> One is to register a callback when an interface is shut down.
Haven't checked out (linux) socket interface yet. I'm very fuzzy how
this can be done. Anyone has good ideas ?
> Another (possibly the best) is to arrange a new signal for lockd
> which say "Drop any locks which were sent to IP addresses that are
> no longer valid local addresses".
Very appealing - but the devil's always in the details. How to decide
which IP address is no longer valid ? Or how does lockd know about these
IP addresses ? And how to associate one particular IP address with the
"struct nlm_file" entries within nlm_files list ? Need few more days to
sort this out (or any one already has ideas in mind ?).
-- Wendy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-14 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-12 5:25 [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface Wendy Cheng
2006-06-12 6:11 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-06-12 15:00 ` [Linux-cluster] " J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-12 15:44 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2006-06-12 16:20 ` [Linux-cluster] " Madhan P
2006-06-12 16:58 ` Madhan P
2006-06-12 18:09 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2006-06-12 17:23 ` [Linux-cluster] " Steve Dickson
2006-06-12 17:27 ` James Yarbrough
2006-06-12 19:07 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2006-06-13 3:17 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-13 7:00 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2006-06-13 7:08 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-14 6:54 ` Wendy Cheng [this message]
2006-06-14 11:36 ` [NFS] " Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-14 13:39 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-06-14 14:00 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-06-15 14:07 ` [NFS] " William A.(Andy) Adamson
2006-06-15 15:09 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-06-16 6:09 ` [Linux-cluster] " Neil Brown
2006-06-16 15:39 ` [NFS] " William A.(Andy) Adamson
2006-06-15 4:27 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2006-06-15 6:39 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-06-15 8:02 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-15 18:43 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-06-13 15:23 ` James Yarbrough
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1150268091.28264.75.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=wcheng@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cluster@redhat.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox