From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brian J. Murrell" Subject: proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:12:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1191949933.30724.56.camel@pc.ilinx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1908163460==" To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfIcq-0000WX-FR for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:12:08 -0700 Received: from server.klug.on.ca ([205.189.48.131]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IfIcu-0001pW-GM for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:12:13 -0700 Received: from linux.interlinx.bc.ca (d38-139-100.home1.cgocable.net [72.38.139.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.klug.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3B52803 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:12:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.75.22.1] (pc.ilinx [10.75.22.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.interlinx.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305C486F8 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:11:00 -0400 (EDT) List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============1908163460== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iRfwz7ZGHWQ65eG78ikO" --=-iRfwz7ZGHWQ65eG78ikO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've been trying to link /proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport to the process the portmapper uses to allocate ports from but have not found it. So perhaps somebody here can answer what I hope is a simple question. Can /proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport be used to limit (the upper bound of) the port range that the portmapper will allocate for all RPC servcies? If I set it to, say, 900, I can be guaranteed that no RPC servers will get bound to ports > 900? Thanx, b. --=20 My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell --=-iRfwz7ZGHWQ65eG78ikO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHC7Ztl3EQlGLyuXARAgNpAJ9A2ZN74OQU9mNiPtlDQ+9AEaDAKwCdGXA6 0CWIWboIkjigbWxStWf5E0w= =4l73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iRfwz7ZGHWQ65eG78ikO-- --===============1908163460== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ --===============1908163460== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs --===============1908163460==--