From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brian J. Murrell" Subject: Re: proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:26:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1191965208.3697.5.camel@pc.ilinx> References: <1191949933.30724.56.camel@pc.ilinx> <1191963460.7052.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1191963718.3697.2.camel@pc.ilinx> <1191964149.7052.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1994138116==" To: nfs Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfMbC-00021c-7A for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:26:42 -0700 Received: from server.klug.on.ca ([205.189.48.131]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IfMbG-00022J-9U for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:26:47 -0700 Received: from linux.interlinx.bc.ca (d38-139-100.home1.cgocable.net [72.38.139.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.klug.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F002803 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.75.22.1] (pc.ilinx [10.75.22.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.interlinx.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5720386F8 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:25:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1191964149.7052.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============1994138116== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/5Y/SS6XVqlyaugWuR2n" --=-/5Y/SS6XVqlyaugWuR2n Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 17:09 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: >=20 > The client processes only. IOW: the nfs client, lockd client and the > posix acl client. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but isn't it the server that (chooses and) binds to a port? What effect does a "max port" have on a client when it has to bind to the port the server chose/was given? > Not as far as I know. Pity. b. --=20 My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell --=-/5Y/SS6XVqlyaugWuR2n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHC/IYl3EQlGLyuXARAts2AJ97+HSv1LY5QMiXh9YJ6rR80hlhdQCfaNIN FVhZcmuPqmI7HMEe80kyGXY= =GmoJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/5Y/SS6XVqlyaugWuR2n-- --===============1994138116== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ --===============1994138116== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs --===============1994138116==--