Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: size of nfsv4 writes
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:46:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212597977.7422.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4846C586.1050000@citi.umich.edu>

On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 12:40 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> While testing NFSv4 performance over the 10GE network, we are seeing the 
> following behavior and would like to know if it is normal or a bug in 
> the client code.
> 
> The server offers the max_write of 1M. The client mounts the server with 
> the "wsize" option of 1M. Yet during the write we are seeing that the 
> write size is at most 49K. Why does client never come close to 1M limit?

I have a feeling that is due to some crap in the VM. I'm currently
investigating a situation where it appears we're sending 1 COMMIT for
every 1-5 32k WRITEs. This is not a policy that stems from the NFS
client, so it would appear that the VM is being silly about things.

I'm specially suspicious of the code in get_dirty_limits() that is
setting a limit to the number of dirty pages based on the number of
pages a given BDI has written out in the recent past. As far as I can
see, the intention is to penalise devices that are slow writers, but in
practice it doesn't do that: it penalises the devices that have the
least activity.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-04 16:40 size of nfsv4 writes Olga Kornievskaia
2008-06-04 16:46 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2008-06-04 22:04   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2008-06-06  0:25     ` Dean Hildebrand
2008-06-12 21:41     ` Olga Kornievskaia
2008-06-13 16:33       ` Chuck Lever
2008-06-13 18:19         ` Olga Kornievskaia
2008-06-13 19:03           ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212597977.7422.4.camel@localhost \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=aglo@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox