Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: set transport defaults after mount option parsing is finished
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:57:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213289857.14478.10.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080612163756.13197.37893.stgit-meopP2rzCrTwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 12:37 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Address some unfortunate mount option parsing behavior by setting certain
> transport-based defaults *after* option parsing is complete.
> 
>  o  Some options don't obey the "rightmost wins" rule.  Jeff Layton
>     noticed that specifying the "proto=" mount option after the "retrans"
>     or "timeo" options will cause the retrans and timeo values to be
>     overwritten with default settings.
> 
>     Allow these options to be specified in any order without unexpectedly
>     reverting retrans and timeo to their default.
> 
>  o  I've received several reports that text-based mounting through
>     firewalls that block UDP fails, even if "proto=tcp" is specified.
> 
>     If a user specifies "proto=tcp" via the legacy mount API, the mount
>     command also uses TCP to contact the server's mount daemon.  Ditto
>     for "proto=udp".  We want the kernel's mount option to emulate this
>     behavior; however, we still want the default mount protocol to be UDP
>     if no transport options were specified.

Why is it necessary to set these defaults in nfs_parse_mount_options?
This is quite unrelated to parsing of the mount string.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-12 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-12 16:37 [PATCH 0/5] For 2.6.27: NFS mount option parsing fix-ups Chuck Lever
     [not found] ` <20080612163416.13197.92911.stgit-meopP2rzCrTwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-12 16:37   ` [PATCH 1/5] NFS: Allow any value for the "retry" option Chuck Lever
2008-06-12 16:37   ` [PATCH 2/5] NFS: Treat "intr" and "nointr" options as deprecated Chuck Lever
2008-06-12 16:37   ` [PATCH 3/5] NFS: missing newline in NFS mount debugging message Chuck Lever
2008-06-12 16:37   ` [PATCH 4/5] NFS: set transport defaults after mount option parsing is finished Chuck Lever
     [not found]     ` <20080612163756.13197.37893.stgit-meopP2rzCrTwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-12 16:57       ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2008-06-12 19:34         ` Chuck Lever
2008-06-12 16:38   ` [PATCH 5/5] NFS: use documenting macro constants for initializing ac{reg, dir}{min, max} Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1213289857.14478.10.camel@localhost \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox