From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Massive NFS problems on large cluster with large number of mounts Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:35:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1216308906.12588.12.camel@localhost> References: <4869E8AB.4060905@aei.mpg.de> <20080701182250.GB21807@fieldses.org> <486B89F5.9000109@aei.mpg.de> <20080702203130.GA24850@fieldses.org> <1215032676.7087.30.camel@localhost> <487DC43F.8040408@aei.mpg.de> <20080716190658.GF20298@fieldses.org> <76bd70e30807170747r31af3280icf0bd3fdbde17bac@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Carsten Aulbert , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Henning Fehrmann , Steffen Grunewald To: chucklever@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from mail-out2.uio.no ([129.240.10.58]:48445 "EHLO mail-out2.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753104AbYGQPfN (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:35:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <76bd70e30807170747r31af3280icf0bd3fdbde17bac-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 10:47 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > I tend to agree. The rpcbind client (at least) does specifically > require a privileged port, so a large min/max port range would be out > of the question for those rpc_clients. 'portmap' does indeed appear to check for privileged ports, but I can't see any such checks in the rpcbind code.