Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: EG Keizer <keie-vHs5IaWfoDhmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/001] nfs: authenticated deep mounting
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:05:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222200358.7799.50.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48AA9122.90805-vHs5IaWfoDhmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 11:23 +0200, EG Keizer wrote:
> Allow mount to do authenticated mounts below the root of the exported tree.
> The wording in RFC 2623, sec 2.3.2. allows fsinfo with UNIX authentication
> on the root of the export. Mounts are not always done on the root
> of the exported tree. Especially autoumounts often mount below the root of
> the exported tree.
> Some server implementations (justly) require full authentication for the
> so-called deep mounts. The old code used AUTH_SYS only. This caused deep
> mounts to fail on systems requiring stronger authentication..
> The client should try both authentication types and use the first one that
> succeeds.
> This method was already partially implemented. This patch completes
> the implementation for NFS2 and NFS3.
> This patch was developed to allow Debian systems to automount home directories
> on Solaris servers with krb5 authentication.
> 
> Tested on kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: E.G. Keizer <keie-vHs5IaWfoDhmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>

I'd like to apply this patch, but it won't apply to 2.6.27-rc7...

Cheers
  Trond

> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
> index 549dbce..ce575e6 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
> @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ nfs3_proc_statfs(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
>   }
> 
>   static int
> -nfs3_proc_fsinfo(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
> +do_proc_fsinfo(struct rpc_clnt *client, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
>   		 struct nfs_fsinfo *info)
>   {
>   	struct rpc_message msg = {
> @@ -696,11 +696,26 @@ nfs3_proc_fsinfo(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
> 
>   	dprintk("NFS call  fsinfo\n");
>   	nfs_fattr_init(info->fattr);
> -	status = rpc_call_sync(server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient, &msg, 0);
> +	status = rpc_call_sync(client, &msg, 0);
>   	dprintk("NFS reply fsinfo: %d\n", status);
>   	return status;
>   }
> 
> +/*
> + * Bare-bones access to fsinfo: this is for nfs_get_root/nfs_get_sb via nfs_create_server
> + */
> +static int
> +nfs3_proc_fsinfo(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
> +		   struct nfs_fsinfo *info)
> +{
> +	int	status;
> +
> +	status = do_proc_fsinfo(server->client, fhandle, info);
> +	if (status && server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient != server->client)
> +		status = do_proc_fsinfo(server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient, fhandle, info);
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
>   static int
>   nfs3_proc_pathconf(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
>   		   struct nfs_pathconf *info)
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/proc.c b/fs/nfs/proc.c
> index 5ccf7fa..f728118 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/proc.c
> @@ -65,14 +65,22 @@ nfs_proc_get_root(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs_fh *fhandle,
> 
>   	dprintk("%s: call getattr\n", __FUNCTION__);
>   	nfs_fattr_init(fattr);
> -	status = rpc_call_sync(server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient, &msg, 0);
> +	status = rpc_call_sync(server->client, &msg, 0);
> +	/* Retry with default authentication if different */
> +	if (status && server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient != server->client) {
> +		status = rpc_call_sync(server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient, &msg, 0);
> +	}
>   	dprintk("%s: reply getattr: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, status);
>   	if (status)
>   		return status;
>   	dprintk("%s: call statfs\n", __FUNCTION__);
>   	msg.rpc_proc = &nfs_procedures[NFSPROC_STATFS];
>   	msg.rpc_resp = &fsinfo;
> -	status = rpc_call_sync(server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient, &msg, 0);
> +	status = rpc_call_sync(server->client, &msg, 0);
> +	/* Retry with default authentication if different */
> +	if (status && server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient != server->client) {
> +		status = rpc_call_sync(server->nfs_client->cl_rpcclient, &msg, 0);
> +	}
>   	dprintk("%s: reply statfs: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, status);
>   	if (status)
>   		return status;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-23 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-19  9:23 [PATCH 001/001] nfs: authenticated deep mounting EG Keizer
     [not found] ` <48AA9122.90805-vHs5IaWfoDhmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-19 20:34   ` [PATCH] " J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-23 20:07     ` Trond Myklebust
2008-09-23 20:05   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222200358.7799.50.camel@localhost \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=keie-vHs5IaWfoDhmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox