From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:50:25 -0500 Message-ID: <1231293025.11487.43.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <20090106200229.GA17031@us.ibm.com> <1231274682.20316.65.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106215831.GE18147@us.ibm.com> <1231283734.8041.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106233238.GD13785@fieldses.org> <1231284943.8041.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1231287607.11487.0.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090107002608.GK13785@fieldses.org> <1231288706.11487.15.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090107014422.GA17913@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Matt Helsley , Linux Containers , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chuck Lever , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:9668 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752652AbZAGBup (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:50:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090107014422.GA17913@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:44 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Again, why? Are you seriously proposing a plan to transport all NFS and > > locking state directly from one kernel to another? > > If people seem to think they can do live process and container > migration: > > http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/mirkin-reprint.pdf > > then moving the NFS state strikes me as not the greatest of their > troubles. ROTFL... -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com