From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd4: split lockstateid/openstateid release logic
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:52:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231717949-31908-2-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231717949-31908-1-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The flags here attempt to make the code more general, but I find it
actually just adds confusion.
I think it's clearer to separate the logic for the open and lock cases
entirely. And eventually we may want to separate the stateowner and
stateid types as well, as many of the fields aren't shared between the
lock and open cases.
Also move to eliminate forward references.
Start with the stateid's.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 88db7d3..6b8e5a9 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ opaque_hashval(const void *ptr, int nbytes)
/* forward declarations */
static void release_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop);
-static void release_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp, int flags);
/*
* Delegation state
@@ -311,6 +310,28 @@ static struct list_head unconf_id_hashtbl[CLIENT_HASH_SIZE];
static struct list_head client_lru;
static struct list_head close_lru;
+static void release_generic_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp)
+{
+ list_del(&stp->st_hash);
+ list_del(&stp->st_perfile);
+ list_del(&stp->st_perstateowner);
+ put_nfs4_file(stp->st_file);
+ kmem_cache_free(stateid_slab, stp);
+}
+
+static void release_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp)
+{
+ locks_remove_posix(stp->st_vfs_file, (fl_owner_t)stp->st_stateowner);
+ release_generic_stateid(stp);
+}
+
+static void release_open_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp)
+{
+ release_stateid_lockowners(stp);
+ nfsd_close(stp->st_vfs_file);
+ release_generic_stateid(stp);
+}
+
static inline void
renew_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
{
@@ -1065,9 +1086,9 @@ unhash_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
stp = list_entry(sop->so_stateids.next,
struct nfs4_stateid, st_perstateowner);
if (sop->so_is_open_owner)
- release_stateid(stp, OPEN_STATE);
+ release_open_stateid(stp);
else
- release_stateid(stp, LOCK_STATE);
+ release_lock_stateid(stp);
}
}
@@ -1106,24 +1127,6 @@ init_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfsd4_open *
}
static void
-release_stateid(struct nfs4_stateid *stp, int flags)
-{
- struct file *filp = stp->st_vfs_file;
-
- list_del(&stp->st_hash);
- list_del(&stp->st_perfile);
- list_del(&stp->st_perstateowner);
- if (flags & OPEN_STATE) {
- release_stateid_lockowners(stp);
- stp->st_vfs_file = NULL;
- nfsd_close(filp);
- } else if (flags & LOCK_STATE)
- locks_remove_posix(filp, (fl_owner_t) stp->st_stateowner);
- put_nfs4_file(stp->st_file);
- kmem_cache_free(stateid_slab, stp);
-}
-
-static void
move_to_close_lru(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
{
dprintk("NFSD: move_to_close_lru nfs4_stateowner %p\n", sop);
@@ -1764,7 +1767,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
init_stateid(stp, fp, open);
status = nfsd4_truncate(rqstp, current_fh, open);
if (status) {
- release_stateid(stp, OPEN_STATE);
+ release_open_stateid(stp);
goto out;
}
}
@@ -2373,7 +2376,7 @@ nfsd4_close(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
memcpy(&close->cl_stateid, &stp->st_stateid, sizeof(stateid_t));
/* release_stateid() calls nfsd_close() if needed */
- release_stateid(stp, OPEN_STATE);
+ release_open_stateid(stp);
/* place unused nfs4_stateowners on so_close_lru list to be
* released by the laundromat service after the lease period
--
1.5.5.rc1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-11 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-11 23:52 minor nfsd4 state code cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-11 23:52 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-01-11 23:52 ` [PATCH] nfsd4: remove a forward declaration J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-11 23:52 ` [PATCH] nfsd4: split open/lockowner release code J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-12 8:52 ` [PATCH] nfsd4: split lockstateid/openstateid release logic Benny Halevy
2009-01-12 16:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1231717949-31908-2-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox