Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 13034] printk in xs_tcp_setup_socket needs rate limit ... and delay
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:58:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240433936.9197.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904222049.n3MKnxZi019947-jEpIWWs/U2wOASNP4CLbKB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>

(Switching to bugzilla email interface, and ccing linux-nfs)

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 20:49 +0000, bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13034
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #12 from Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>  2009-04-22 20:49:58 ---
> Unfortunately I have no access to the server (they are some NetApp and EMC
> storage devices maintained by company IT).
> 
> It seems that they are all configured same way, so after mount they start
> timing out connections all at the same moment (after 10 minutes since mount, or
> something like that), and netstat above is captured when I run 'df' after
> connections moved from established to time_wait on client side.  That TIME_WAIT
> disappear after 60 seconds, as expected.

So these connections are basically timing out because the systems are
idle? (FYI: the NFS convention is that clients are supposed to close the
TCP connection if it has been idle for 5 minutes, whereas the servers
usually close it if the client has been idle for 6 minutes)...



       reply	other threads:[~2009-04-22 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-13034-104@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <200904222049.n3MKnxZi019947@demeter.kernel.org>
     [not found]   ` <200904222049.n3MKnxZi019947-jEpIWWs/U2wOASNP4CLbKB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-22 20:58     ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
     [not found]       ` <1240433936.9197.9.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-22 22:22         ` [Bug 13034] printk in xs_tcp_setup_socket needs rate limit ... and delay Petr Vandrovec
2009-04-23  0:52           ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]             ` <1240447977.9197.14.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-23  7:02               ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1240433936.9197.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petr@vandrovec.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox