From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
urs.thuermann-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org,
oliver.hartkopp-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org,
wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org,
vladislav.yasevich@hp.com, sri@us.ibm.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sunrpc/auth_gss: Call rcu_barrier() on module unload.
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:00:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244480449.5040.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090608162656.GF6961@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 09:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > As the module uses rcu_call() we should make sure that all
> > rcu callback has been completed before removing the code.
>
> Good improvement!!! Assuming that gss_svc_shutdown() and
> rpcauth_unregister() prevent any future RCU callbacks to be registered,
> this patch will fix things up.
>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >
> > net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
> > index e630b38..66d458f 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
> > @@ -1548,6 +1548,7 @@ static void __exit exit_rpcsec_gss(void)
> > {
> > gss_svc_shutdown();
> > rpcauth_unregister(&authgss_ops);
> > + rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
> > }
> >
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >
Hmm... If this is about ensuring that all the call_rcu() callbacks
complete before we remove the module, then don't we also need similar
barriers in net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.c:cleanup_sunrpc() and in
fs/nfs/inode.c:exit_nfs_fs()?
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 13:11 [PATCH 0/5] We must use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] 8021q: Vlan driver should use rcu_barrier() on unload instead of syncronize_net() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfnetlink_queue: Use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-10 5:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] can: af_can.c use " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 13:24 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-06-10 8:10 ` David Miller
2009-06-10 10:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-10 11:33 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-06-08 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-08 17:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] sctp: protocol.c call rcu_barrier() on unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-09 15:44 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-06-09 15:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-09 16:26 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] sunrpc/auth_gss: Call rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-08 17:00 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
[not found] ` <1244480449.5040.4.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 19:48 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 21:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-08 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] We must use " Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 8:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244480449.5040.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.hartkopp-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=urs.thuermann-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox