From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS ML <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:43:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247571788.19099.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A5C3858.6070303@garzik.org>
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 03:48 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The NFSv4 client just oops'd on me...
>
> NFSv4 client: 2.6.31-rc3, Fedora 10, x86-64
> 2.6.30 works, I think 2.6.31-rc1 worked too
>
> NFSv4 server: 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 (Fedora 11 kernel), F11, x86-64
>
> Oops output captured at kerneloops.org:
> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid=
>
> Kernel config for 2.6.31-rc3, the problematic kernel, attached.
>
>
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02db5b0>] [<ffffffffa02db5b0>] nfs4_free_lock_state+0x20/0x80 [nfs]
> > [...]
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffffa02db7dd>] nfs4_set_lock_state+0x1cd/0x220 [nfs]
> > [<ffffffffa02cc9db>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x2cb/0x4e0 [nfs]
> > [<ffffffff810b40dc>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x10c/0x600
> > [<ffffffffa02b6079>] do_setlk+0xb9/0xd0 [nfs]
> > [<ffffffffa02b6220>] nfs_lock+0xd0/0x1d0 [nfs]
> > [<ffffffff8111e883>] vfs_lock_file+0x23/0x50
> > [<ffffffff8111eaa3>] fcntl_setlk+0x133/0x2f0
> > [<ffffffff81192571>] ? __up_read+0x91/0xb0
> > [<ffffffff810f0fea>] sys_fcntl+0xca/0x420
> > [<ffffffff8100b4fb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Wow... That bug appears to have been there for years. I'm surprised it
hasn't been reported before.
Anyhow, it looks to me as if you are hitting the case in
nfs4_get_lock_state() where the first call to __nfs4_find_lock_state()
fails, (and so 'new' gets allocated) then the second call succeeds. When
the routine attempts to free the now redundant 'new', the call to
nfs4_free_lock_state() oopses because new->ls_state hasn't been set.
The following patch ought to fix it...
---------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
NFSv4: Fix an Oops in nfs4_free_lock_state
The oops http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid= appears to
be due to the nfs4_lock_state->ls_state field being uninitialised. This
happens if the call to nfs4_free_lock_state() is triggered at the end of
nfs4_get_lock_state().
The fixe is to move the initialisation of ls_state into the allocator.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index b73c5a7..65ca8c1 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, f
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lsp->ls_sequence.list);
lsp->ls_seqid.sequence = &lsp->ls_sequence;
atomic_set(&lsp->ls_count, 1);
+ lsp->ls_state = state;
lsp->ls_owner = fl_owner;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
nfs_alloc_unique_id(&clp->cl_lockowner_id, &lsp->ls_id, 1, 64);
@@ -587,7 +588,6 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_get_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, fl_
if (lsp != NULL)
break;
if (new != NULL) {
- new->ls_state = state;
list_add(&new->ls_locks, &state->lock_states);
set_bit(LK_STATE_IN_USE, &state->flags);
lsp = new;
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-14 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 7:48 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops) Jeff Garzik
2009-07-14 11:43 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
[not found] ` <1247571788.19099.32.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-15 1:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-21 23:08 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247571788.19099.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox