From: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@us.ibm.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: NFS List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
NFS V4 Mailing List <nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATHC] nfsd: Fix a couple issues with POSIX->NFSv4 ACL conversion
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:40:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251394811.32255.6.camel@dyn9047022153> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090824235944.GH8532@fieldses.org>
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 19:59 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:02:30PM -0700, Frank Filz wrote:
> > 1. GROUP@ Allow entry doesn't have NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP, This
> > appears to have been introduced by accident as part of commit
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=bec50c47aaf6f1f9247f1860547ab394a0802a4c
>
> It's good to flip that bit every now and then just to keep client
> implementations on their toes....
>
> (Slightly more seriously, the 4.1 draft says "The
> ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP flag MUST be ignored on entries with these
> special identifiers. When encoding entries with these special
> identifiers, the ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP flag SHOULD be set to
> zero." It really shouldn't matter either way, but the point is
> that this flag is used to distinguish named users from named
> groups (since unix allows a group to have the same name as a
> user), so it doesn't really make sense to use it on a special
> identifier such as this.)
Ok, that makes sense, in that case, we probably should have this
fragment to remove the flag from the GROUP@ deny entry:
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ _posix_to_nfsv4_one(struct posix_acl *pacl, struct nfs4_acl *acl,
deny = ~pas.group & pas.other;
if (deny) {
ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
- ace->flag = eflag | NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
ace->access_mask = deny_mask_from_posix(deny, flags);
ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_GROUP;
ace++;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-27 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-14 22:02 [PATHC] nfsd: Fix a couple issues with POSIX->NFSv4 ACL conversion Frank Filz
2009-08-24 23:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-27 17:40 ` Frank Filz [this message]
2009-08-27 21:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251394811.32255.6.camel@dyn9047022153 \
--to=ffilzlnx@us.ibm.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox