public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: NFSv3 list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] client cannot get lock after other client got lock occur network partition.
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:16:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257772609.3754.11.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF7DEAB.20202@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 17:19 +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> Hi Trond et all
> 
> There is a bug, when i test NFSv3 file's lock as followed:
> 
> Step1: ClientA and ClientB open a same nfs file;
> Step2: ClientA locks file with write lock, it's ok;
> Step3: Cut off the network between ClientA and Server;
> Step4: ClientB can not acquire for write lock successful forever, even though
>        the network partition larger than NLM_HOST_EXPIRE.
> 
> As i know, If use NFSv4, step4 can success after LEASE_TIME.
> 
> Is it necessary to fix NFSv3 ? 
> 
> The attached patch can make this case OK, but i am not sure it's good.

Unfortunately, NLM (the NFSv2 and v3 locking protocol) is not lease
based, so the above scenario is truly an unfixable one.

The problem with applying your patch is, in essence, that we risk
breaking another scenario where a client grabs a lock, and then holds it
for a while.
The reason this breaks is that there is no equivalent in the NLM
protocol of the NFSv4 RENEW operation to tell the server that "This
client is still alive and wants you to keep its state".

Cheers,
  Trond



  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-09  9:19 [RFC][PATCH] client cannot get lock after other client got lock occur network partition Mi Jinlong
2009-11-09 13:16 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
     [not found]   ` <1257772609.3754.11.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-10  9:38     ` Mi Jinlong
2009-11-10 12:35       ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found]         ` <1257856550.3046.6.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-11  9:34           ` Mi Jinlong
2009-11-11 14:02             ` Peter Staubach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257772609.3754.11.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox