public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] nfs41: New NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING state
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:47:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260197272.32136.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260174111-23160-5-git-send-email-Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:21 -0800, Ricardo Labiaga wrote: 
> nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot() can also be invoked as a
> result of error processing, so it is not a safe place to
> invoke RECLAIM_COMPLETE.  Instead, create a new state
> flag that tracks the fact that a RECLAIM_COMPLETE needs
> to be issued when all state has been reclaimed, or when
> we're done establishing the session for the first time.
> 
> If an error occurs in the main state manager loop, just clear the
> flag.  No sense in checking if the flag is set in order to clear it.
> We're not going to issue the RECLAIM_COMPLETE since there's a high
> probability that we had some kind of communication or session problem
> which is s how we ended up in the error case.

This patch looks wrong for two reasons.

     1. We only want to call RECLAIM_COMPLETE if we saw a STALE_CLIENTID
        error prior to the last attempt to re-establish the client id. 
     2. We have to call it before we can start the no-grace reclaims.

Looking at the code, I'm not convinced that we need a separate
'RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING' state. It should be pretty much identical to
the existing NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_REBOOT state.
The only difference is that in the NFSv4.1 case we want to be able to
call RECLAIM_COMPLETE even in the case where we have no state to
reclaim.

Cheers
  Trond

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-07 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-07  8:21 [PATCH 0/5] Reclaim Stage Bug Fixes Version 2 Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07  8:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] nfs41: Mark stateids in need of reclaim if state manager gets stale clientid Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07  8:21   ` [PATCH 2/5] nfs41: Handle session errors during delegation return Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07  8:21     ` [PATCH 3/5] nfs41: Retry delegation return if it failed with session error Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07  8:21       ` [PATCH 4/5] nfs41: New NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING state Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07  8:21         ` [PATCH 5/5] nfs41: Handle NFSv4.1 session errors in the delegation recall code Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 14:47         ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-12-07 17:51           ` [PATCH 4/5] nfs41: New NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING state Labiaga, Ricardo
2009-12-07 18:11             ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-07 21:41               ` Labiaga, Ricardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1260197272.32136.19.camel@localhost \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox