From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] nfs41: New NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING state
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:47:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260197272.32136.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260174111-23160-5-git-send-email-Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:21 -0800, Ricardo Labiaga wrote:
> nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot() can also be invoked as a
> result of error processing, so it is not a safe place to
> invoke RECLAIM_COMPLETE. Instead, create a new state
> flag that tracks the fact that a RECLAIM_COMPLETE needs
> to be issued when all state has been reclaimed, or when
> we're done establishing the session for the first time.
>
> If an error occurs in the main state manager loop, just clear the
> flag. No sense in checking if the flag is set in order to clear it.
> We're not going to issue the RECLAIM_COMPLETE since there's a high
> probability that we had some kind of communication or session problem
> which is s how we ended up in the error case.
This patch looks wrong for two reasons.
1. We only want to call RECLAIM_COMPLETE if we saw a STALE_CLIENTID
error prior to the last attempt to re-establish the client id.
2. We have to call it before we can start the no-grace reclaims.
Looking at the code, I'm not convinced that we need a separate
'RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING' state. It should be pretty much identical to
the existing NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_REBOOT state.
The only difference is that in the NFSv4.1 case we want to be able to
call RECLAIM_COMPLETE even in the case where we have no state to
reclaim.
Cheers
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-07 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 8:21 [PATCH 0/5] Reclaim Stage Bug Fixes Version 2 Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 8:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] nfs41: Mark stateids in need of reclaim if state manager gets stale clientid Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfs41: Handle session errors during delegation return Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 8:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] nfs41: Retry delegation return if it failed with session error Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 8:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] nfs41: New NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING state Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 8:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] nfs41: Handle NFSv4.1 session errors in the delegation recall code Ricardo Labiaga
2009-12-07 14:47 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-12-07 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] nfs41: New NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING state Labiaga, Ricardo
2009-12-07 18:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-07 21:41 ` Labiaga, Ricardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1260197272.32136.19.camel@localhost \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox