From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:36:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269531400.3648.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:48 +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've enabled rcu correctness for my todays 2.6.34-rc2 kernel.
>
> I'm getting this INFO: from my kvm guest (which uses host's nfs
> exported directory.)
> This
>
> ===================================================
> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> fs/nfs/delegation.c:348 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> 2 locks held by rm/1820:
> #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13/1){+.+.+.}, at:
> [<ffffffff81138e1b>] do_unlinkat+0x9b/0x1c0
> #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81136a76>]
> vfs_unlink+0x56/0xf0
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 1820, comm: rm Not tainted 2.6.34-rc2-00186-ge79a302 #60
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff810819fb>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xbb/0xc0
> [<ffffffffa0228351>] nfs_inode_return_delegation+0x101/0x110 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa01fd58d>] nfs_unlink+0xad/0x2a0 [nfs]
> [<ffffffff81136aba>] vfs_unlink+0x9a/0xf0
> [<ffffffff81148365>] ? mnt_want_write+0x65/0xb0
> [<ffffffff81138f03>] do_unlinkat+0x183/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff8142b66d>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
> [<ffffffff81083985>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x155/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff8142a232>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [<ffffffff811390a2>] sys_unlinkat+0x22/0x40
> [<ffffffff81031dc8>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x2c
>
It is a 100% bogus warning. There are tentative patches floating around
to fix the above warning, but they haven't been merged yet.
In the meantime, please ignore...
Cheers
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 10:48 INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Zdenek Kabelac
[not found] ` <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-25 15:36 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
[not found] ` <1269531400.3648.1.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-29 15:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-29 17:14 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1269882883.3181.25.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-29 18:56 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269531400.3648.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox