linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Debugging fcntl() file locks
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:46:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274967997.14002.42.camel@thorin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274963686.2895.7.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

Hi!

On Don, 2010-05-27 at 08:34 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:11 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
> > How can I debug fcntl() file locks on a NFSv3-client?
> > The server side is a NetApp-Box (no details at hand but I can ask).
> > The client side are stock-RHEL5.3/CentOS-5.3 kernels - 2.6.18-92.el5.
> > 
> > The file system in question is mounted on 2 clients. flock() on a file
> > succeeds but fcntl() fails with EAGAIN. From what I found in the
> > Internet and manual pages, this means that someone else already locked
> > that file (- the file is successfully open()ed read/write so it can't be
> > "your are not allowed to write-lock the file").
> > But how do I find out on which host and which process?
> > 
> > strace shows:
> > ----  snip  ----
> > open("/... secret ...", O_RDWR) = 3
> > ioctl(3, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0x7fff7925b400) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
> > lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR)                   = 0
> > fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=935, ...}) = 0
> > fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)           = 0
> > flock(3, LOCK_EX|LOCK_NB)               = 0
> > fcntl(3, F_SETLK, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=0}) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
> > ----  snip  ---- 
> > [ This is a perl script using CPAN modules at the top. ]
[...]
> The Linux NFS client does not allow you to lock a file using both
> flock() and POSIX locks. You should choose one or the other locking
> scheme. If you remove the flock() line above, then the POSIX lock will
> likely succeed.

Thanks.
Does flock() work on NFS these days on NFS?
Historically that was not the case IIRC.

	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-27 10:11 Debugging fcntl() file locks Bernd Petrovitsch
2010-05-27 12:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-27 13:46   ` Bernd Petrovitsch [this message]
2010-05-27 14:18     ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-28  9:36       ` Bernd Petrovitsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1274967997.14002.42.camel@thorin \
    --to=bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).