linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: sunrpc: what prevents an xprt from being freed before task_cleanup runs?
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:49:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280861363.12283.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280860815.9771.25.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 14:40 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 13:24 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > We got a report recently about a panic in RHEL5 (2.6.18 based kernel).
> > The problem appears to be that a task_cleanup workqueue job ran and got
> > passed a pointer to an xprt that had been freed. The bug is here in
> > case anyone is interested in the details:
> > 
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611938
> > 
> > The situation seems to be pretty difficult to reproduce, but I don't
> > see anything that's intended to ensure that this doesn't occur in RHEL5
> > or mainline. The task_cleanup workqueue job doesn't hold a reference to
> > the xprt, and the job isn't canceled when the xprt is torn down.
> > 
> > Bruce had a look and suggested that we may need something like the
> > patch below (pasted in, so it probably won't apply correctly). I've
> > tested a backported version of it on RHEL5 and it seems to work fine.
> > 
> > Is it reasonable to cancel task_cleanup when destroying the xprt? Or,
> > am I missing something that should prevent this situation in mainline
> > (and perhaps isn't in RHEL5's kernel).
> > 
> > Any help is appreciated...
> > 
> > -----------------------------[snip]---------------------------------
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> > index dcd0132..2a1f664 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> > @@ -1129,6 +1129,7 @@ static void xprt_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> >   rpc_destroy_wait_queue(&xprt->sending);
> >   rpc_destroy_wait_queue(&xprt->resend);
> >   rpc_destroy_wait_queue(&xprt->backlog);
> > + cancel_work_sync(&xprt->task_cleanup);
> >   /*
> >    * Tear down transport state and free the rpc_xprt
> >    */
> > -----------------------------[snip]---------------------------------
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> How about doing a wait_on_bit_lock(&xprt->state, XPRT_LOCKED,...)
> instead?

Hmm... On the other hand, since xprt_destroy() may get called from
inside the rpciod_workqueue, the wait_on_bit_lock() may end up
deadlocking.

Nevermind, then. Let's go with the cancel_work_sync().


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-03 17:24 sunrpc: what prevents an xprt from being freed before task_cleanup runs? Jeff Layton
2010-08-03 18:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-03 18:48   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-03 18:56     ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-03 19:18       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-03 18:49   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2010-08-03 21:22     ` [PATCH] SUNRPC: prevent task_cleanup running on freed xprt J. Bruce Fields
2010-08-03 21:32       ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-03 18:59   ` sunrpc: what prevents an xprt from being freed before task_cleanup runs? Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1280861363.12283.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).